<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Benchmark - Tag - Simi Studio</title>
        <link>/en/tags/benchmark/</link>
        <description>Benchmark - Tag - Simi Studio</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</managingEditor>
            <webMaster>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 10:00:00 &#43;0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/en/tags/benchmark/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>2026 Coding Agent Benchmark: Claude Code vs Cursor vs Copilot vs Devin</title>
    <link>/en/posts/coding-agent-benchmark/</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/coding-agent-benchmark/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[Early 2026, coding agent capability comparison across vendors. Tested with same questions: completion rate, code quality, speed, cost—objective cross-section.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>AI Coding Intelligence Evaluation: 2026 Early-Year Model Comparison</title>
    <link>/en/posts/ai-code-intelligence-benchmarks/</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/ai-code-intelligence-benchmarks/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[Early 2026, Claude 3.7, GPT-4o, o3-mini, Gemini 2.0 each have strengths. This article gives an objective cross-section of real coding capabilities, no hype.]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
