<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Claude - Tag - Simi Studio</title>
        <link>/en/tags/claude/</link>
        <description>Claude - Tag - Simi Studio</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</managingEditor>
            <webMaster>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:30:00 &#43;0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/en/tags/claude/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>Have Multimodal LLMs Matured: Early 2026 Real Testing</title>
    <link>/en/posts/multimodal-llm-evolution/</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:30:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/multimodal-llm-evolution/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.7 all support multimodal. Image, audio, video understanding—which is strongest? Real testing results in this article.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>Computer Use Agent Roundup: Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini - Who Controls Computers Best</title>
    <link>/en/posts/computer-use-agent-analysis/</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/computer-use-agent-analysis/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[Computer Use (AI directly controlling computers) is the hottest direction in 2026. Anthropic, OpenAI, Google all released solutions. This article横向对比实测结果.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>AI Coding Intelligence Evaluation: 2026 Early-Year Model Comparison</title>
    <link>/en/posts/ai-code-intelligence-benchmarks/</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/ai-code-intelligence-benchmarks/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[Early 2026, Claude 3.7, GPT-4o, o3-mini, Gemini 2.0 each have strengths. This article gives an objective cross-section of real coding capabilities, no hype.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>Claude 4 Deep Dive: Real Difference Between Sonnet and Opus</title>
    <link>/en/posts/claude-4-sonnet-deep-dive/</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/claude-4-sonnet-deep-dive/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[After Claude 4 launch, Sonnet and Opus are the two main versions. One month of real testing: where's the actual gap, which to pick for coding, and what Opus's premium price gets you.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>LLM Selection Guide: Claude vs GPT-4o vs Gemini—Which One to Pick</title>
    <link>/en/posts/ai-model-selection-guide/</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 09:40:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/ai-model-selection-guide/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[Claude 3.7, GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0—how to choose? A practical framework for model selection.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>LLM Reasoning Models: What o1/o3/C4 Actually Solve</title>
    <link>/en/posts/llm-reasoning-models-deep-dive/</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:15:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/llm-reasoning-models-deep-dive/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[OpenAI o1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, o3—reasoning models have been hot for a year. This article explains from an engineering perspective: what reasoning models are, how they differ from regular LLMs, and when to use them.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>2025 AI Coding Tools Year-End Review: From GPT-4 to Claude 3</title>
    <link>/en/posts/ai-coding-tools-2025-yearly/</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 08:18:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/ai-coding-tools-2025-yearly/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[2025 was a year of rapid iteration for AI coding tools. From GPT-4 to Claude 3, from Copilot to Cursor—the landscape changed profoundly. This article reviews the year's key turning points.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>2025 AI Coding: Tool Landscape Settles, Engineering Practices Mature</title>
    <link>/en/posts/ai-coding-2025-state-of-the-art/</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/ai-coding-2025-state-of-the-art/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[2025 was the year AI coding went from chaos to order. Tool landscape settled, engineering practices accumulated, evaluation standards established. This article records my observations on AI coding's evolution this year.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>2024 AI Coding: Pits I Fell Into and Lessons I Learned</title>
    <link>/en/posts/ai-coding-2024-retrospective/</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/ai-coding-2024-retrospective/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[2024 was the year AI coding exploded. Cursor went mainstream, Claude 3 redefined programming models, Agent tools emerged. This is my real-world retrospective—vendor-free.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>Claude 3 After One Month: Sonnet Is the Real Coding Model</title>
    <link>/en/posts/claude-3-one-month-later/</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:00:00 &#43;0800</pubDate>
    <author>simi@simi.studio (Simi)</author>
    <guid>/en/posts/claude-3-one-month-later/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[Claude 3 dropped in February 2024. After a month of heavy use, Sonnet surprised me—it's the best coding model, not Opus. Here's honest feedback after $200 in API costs.]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
